ALLEGED MISCONDUCT PERPETRATED BY PRINCIPAL MEMBER:
Based on the following evidence the author alleges that principal member Aaron Suthers is alleged to be corrupt*
Aaron Suthers Page 86 NCAT 2021-2022 Annual Report
Suthers, Aaron LLB
Principal Member. Accredited specialist (Family Law). Accredited mediator, NMAS – FDRP. 1995, admitted to legal practice. Formerly a Director of Cheney Suthers Lawyers, Orange. From 2006-2009, Member, Guardianship and Administration Tribunal (Qld); 2009-2014, Member, Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal; 2014-2018, Senior Legal Member, NCAT.
The author has had extensive experience with m.Suthers in multiple proceedings.From those unfortunate & unpleasant experiences it is the authors option that m.Suthers is alleged to be a bully who abuses his authority;believes himself to be above the law & condones agency alleged CORRUPT CONDUCT
The author alleges that m.Suthers has:
- deliberately & maliciously made false & misleading statements
- deliberately & maliciously subjected the author to harassment
- deliberately ignored statutory obligations
- deliberately misinterpreted & misapplied legislation
- legitimized UNLAWFUL / ALLEGED CORRUPT CONDUCT by GSE Act employed registry officers
in these proceedings to allegedly deliberately & maliciously seek to cause the me a disadvantage in proceedings & to punish me for being required to fight for my legislative rights.
However I leave it up to the reader to form their own opinion
1. Case study: Zonnevylle v Dept of Education; Zonnevylle v Dept of Ed [2023] NSWCATAP 53
Case numbers 2022/00196935 & 2022/00036436
Link: Zonnevylle v Dept of Education; Zonnevylle v Depart of Ed [2023] NSWCATAP 53
A.In the above proceedings m.Suthers was provided with documents INCLUDING those UNLAWFUL RESTRICTIONS imposed on the author by the ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE Act employed Lousie Clegg
On August 23,2022,GSE Act employed Louise Clegg imposed a number of restrictions against me (copy of email)
These restrictions include:
- refusal of my LEGITIMATE REQUEST for my Fee Waiver application to be reviewed by the principal registrar
- refusal to accept my LEGITIMATE credit card payment authorities (CCPA) for NCAT application fees
- refusal to accept my CCPAs for hearing sound recording purchases
- refusal to accept emailed correspondence from my nominated email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/000196935)
- refusal to accept any posted applications / documents which include GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/000196935)
B. m.Suthers is fully aware that
- he has the STATUTORY OBLIGATION to promote the objects of NSW legislation (laws) INCLUDING THE GOVERNMENT SECTOR EMPLOYMENT ACT (GSE Act).
- GSE Act employed officers such as those GSE Act employed registry staff are subject to those LEGISLATED MANDATORY CONDUCT OBLIGATIONS under GSE Act Sect.7 Government Sector Core Values
- parties to proceedings are required to send all correspondence / submissions / applications through the NCAT registry and therefore via those GSE Act employed registry staff
C. m.Suthers was fully aware that the NCAT registry’s UNLAWFUL REFUSAL to
- to accept my LEGITIMATE credit card payment authorities (CCPA) for NCAT application fees
- refusal to accept my CCPAs for hearing sound recording purchases
is based on a deliberate & malicious FALSEHOOD as he was provided with that EVIDENCE
D. m.Suthers was fully aware that the NCAT registry’s UNLAWFUL REFUSAL to
- accept emailed correspondence from my nominated email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/00196935)
- accept any posted applications / documents which include GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/00196935)
gravely risked the integrity of the proceedings such that
- legitimate correspondence
- legitimate applications
- legitimate submissions
could and would most likely be UNLAWFULLY REJECTED by those ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE ACT EMPLOYED NCAT STAFF
E. m.Suthers was fully aware that
- the authors NOMINATED EMAIL ADDRESS for proceedings 2022/00196935 is GRIFFIN@PZGIPA
- the email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM was accepted by the NCAT registry PRIOR to the ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE Act employed Louise Clegg’s UNLAWFUL RESTRICTIONS
m.Suthers was also provided with EVIDENCE that despite those UNLAWFUL RESTRICTIONS imposed by the ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE ACT employed Louise Clegg,the NCAT registry CONTINUED TO SEND the author NOTICES & ORDERS to that same email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM
F. m.Suthers was fully aware that the ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE ACT employed Louise Clegg DID NOT provide any reasons for her UNLAWFUL REFUSAL of the email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM
G. The NCAT Member terms & conditions handbook states:
7.2.1 Procedures for raising concerns about inappropriate workplace conduct
If a Member has a complaint or concern about the conduct of another Member or of a registry staff
member, the Member should raise the concern with the relevant Division Head or the President. Where
the complaint or concern is about the conduct of a Division Head or Judge, that complaint or concern
should be raised with the President.
If a Member witnesses unacceptable behaviour, that Member has a responsibility to report that behavior
to a Division Head or the President.
Members and staff retain their rights to complain directly to other authorities.
Members should be aware that Registry staff members have been directed to raise with their supervisor,
Divisional Registrar or the Principal Registrar any complaint or concern they may have about a possible
breach of 7.2 by a Member.
In the event that a Member is the subject of any complaint then the Member is expected to co-operate
with any investigation, including any external investigation, which follows that complaint.
The alleged corrupt Aaron Suthers was witness to the UNLAWFUL CONDUCT / ALLEGED CORRUPT CONDUCT being perpetrated against me in proceedings.
THE ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS DID NOTHING TO PROTECT ME FROM THAT ALLEGED CORRUPT CONDUCT.
THE ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS IS ALLEGED TO HAVE DELIBERATELY & MALICIOUSLY USED THAT ALLEGED CORRUPT REGISTRY CONDUCT TO IMPOSE UNJUST & MALICIOUS COSTS ORDERS AGAINS ME IN PROCEEDINGS 2022/000196935
THE ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS IS ALLEGED TO HAVE CORRUPTLY ABUSED HIS AUTHORITY IN THESE PROCEEDINGS AS A RESULT OF HIS ALLEGED PETTINESS & VINDICTIVENESS
SIMILARLY,THE ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS IS ALLEGED TO HAVE DELIBERATELY BREACHED HIS STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CIVIL & ADMINSTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT SECT.62 WRITTEN REASONS TO UNDERMINE THE INTEGRITY OF THE TRIBUNAL
H. As stated in D. m.Suthers was fully aware that the NCAT registry’s UNLAWFUL REFUSAL to
- accept emailed correspondence from my nominated email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/00196935)
- accept any posted applications / documents which include GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/00196935)
gravely risked the integrity of the proceedings such that
- legitimate correspondence
- legitimate applications
- legitimate submissions
could and would most likely be UNLAWFULLY REJECTED by those ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE ACT EMPLOYED NCAT STAFF
As a result of the conduct of those ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE ACT EMPLOYED NCAT STAFF ,I sent my submissions / applications / correspondence directly to both the ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS & the respondent under FORCE MAJEURE GROUNDS.
It appears from reading of the ALLEGED CORRUPT DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUSANNE COLE / the ALLEGED CORRUPTROBERT DUBLER decision:
Zonnevylle v Secretary, Department of Education [2023] NSWCATAP 206
that the ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS DID NOT FORWARD my submissions / applications / correspondence to either the ALLEGED CORRUPT DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUSANNE COLE or the ALLEGED CORRUPT ROBERT DUBLER therefore allegedly deliberately & maliciously prejudicing me in these proceedings.
I WOULD ALLEGED THAT THIS IS PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE BY THE ALLEGED CORRUPT AARON SUTHERS
* Corruption as defined by ICAC Act Sect.7,8 & 9
NOTE: Principal member Aaron Suthers has been the subject of complaints from the author however principal member Aaron Suthers has refused to respond
* SRNLPA = Self Represented,Non-Legal Professional (time poor,resource poor) Applicants
REFER TO OUR DISCLAIMER:
DISCLAIMER:
The Information on this website does not in any way constitute legal advice,is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon in anyway despite our best efforts to be factual & transparent (when in doubt it is best to seek legal advice)
The information on this website is general in nature and includes publicly available information as well as the experiences of the website author.
Before copying,reproduction or use of any of the material provided on this website we request you seek permission as the website author may exercise copyright privileges.
We invite comment & details of similar experiences shared with other members of the public.