Based on the following evidence the author alleges that GSE Act employed NCAT registry officer Christine Skinner (ID cskinn0) is alleged to be corrupt*
However I leave it up to the reader to form their own opinion.
CASE STUDY #1 Abuse of Authority / Serious Harassment
1. Zonnevylle (SRNLPA*) v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWCATAD 187
- Hearing dates: 6 May 2022
- Date of orders: 7 June 2022
- Decision date: 7 June 2022
- Before: the ALLEGED CORRUPT Michael Griffin, Senior Member (refer to menu for details)
[7] As soon the hearing was convened, the applicant asked to be permitted to audio-record the proceedings on his personal recording device.
[8] Having heard these submissions from the applicant, I refused his request to audio-record the proceedings.
2. Jul.5,2022 Tribunal receives Express Post documents
- Appeal application for 2021/000337143 (case file 2022/000196935)
with grounds for appeal (AAF) - Fee waiver application form for AAF (FWAF)
- Credit card payment Authority for AAF (CCPA)
AND
- Sound recording application for the 2021/000337143 May 6,2022 hearing (SRA)
- FWAF for SRA
- CCPA for SRA
NOTE: The SRA is required for the grounds for appeal.
3. Jul.8,2022 The SRNLPA receives the following notices from NCAT registrar
GSE Act employed Christine Skinner
a. Emailed notice to GRIFFIN@pzgipa.com (Notice here)
- Appeal application for 2021/000337143 (case file 2022/000196935)
- FWAF refused
- CCPA & AAF to be processed
b. Emailed notice to decgipa042020@pzgipa.com (Notice here)
- SRA for 2021/000337143
- FWAF refused
- No reference to CCPA.SRA fee is to be paid
No reasons provided for refusing the CCPA
4. Jul.27,2022 the ALLEGED CORRUPT Aaron Suthers orders 2022/000196935 emailed to GRIFFIN@pzgipa.com (Order here)
Orders at [7]
(4) If a party wishes to rely on a sound recording of a hearing, the party must identify for the Appeal Panel which parts of the sound recording are relied in their written submissions.
Orders at [8]
The application by the appellant for leave to record the hearing under the Court Security Act is refused. # Oral reasons given.
The ALLEGED CORRUPT Christine Skinner has deliberately obstructed the SRNLPA from accessing EVIDENCE (the May 6 2022 hearing sound recording) required for the appeal of the ALLEGED CORRUPT Michael Griffins Jun 7,2022 decision.
CASE STUDY #2 Abuse of Authority / Serious Harassment RECIDIVISM
Details to be posted soon
* Corruption as defined by ICAC Act Sect.7,8 & 9
NOTE: GSE Act employed Christine Skinner has been requested a right of reply concerning the authors complaints but to date GSE Act employed Christine Skinner has refused to respond
* SRNLPA = Self Represented,Non-Legal Professional (time poor,resource poor) Applicants
REFER TO OUR DISCLAIMER:
DISCLAIMER:
The Information on this website does not in any way constitute legal advice,is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon in anyway despite our best efforts to be factual & transparent (when in doubt it is best to seek legal advice)
The information on this website is general in nature and includes publicly available information as well as the experiences of the website author.
Before copying,reproduction or use of any of the material provided on this website we request you seek permission as the website author may exercise copyright privileges.
We invite comment & details of similar experiences shared with other members of the public.