MISCONDUCT – LOUISE CLEGG,REG.STAFF

Based on the following evidence the author alleges that GSE Act employed NCAT registry officer Louise Clegg (ID lclegg0) is alleged to be a corrupt congential liar*

However I leave it up to the reader to form their own opinion.

A. On August 14,2022 I sent NCAT a complaint concerning the ALLEGED CORRUPT GSE Act employed MICHELE BECHINI who I alleged has deliberately & maliciously sought to cause me a detriment in proceedings / cause me serious harassment (copy of email)

B. On August 23,2022,GSE Act employed Louise Clegg imposed a number of restrictions against me

(copy of email)

These restrictions include:

1. refusal of my LEGITIMATE REQUEST for my Fee Waiver application to be reviewed by the principal registrar
2. refusal to accept my LEGITIMATE credit card payment authorities (CCPA) for NCAT application fees
3. refusal to accept my CCPAs for hearing sound recording purchases
4. refusal to accept emailed correspondence from my nominated email address GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/000196935)
5. refusal to accept any posted applications / documents which include GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM (used in current proceedings 2022/000196935)

ITEM 1.

a. The NCAT documents / regulations

• NCAT FEE WAIVER APPLICATION FORM &
• Civil & Adminstrative Tribunal Regulation (CATR) Sect.6.4

provide the GSE Act employed principal registrar the authority to decide on fee reductions / fee waivers (and therefore the authority to review decisions by subordinate GSE Act employed registry officers)

b. The NCAT webpage “Reduced fees & fee waivers” states:

Fee waivers

The Principal Registrar can waive any fee in whole or in part if the Principal Registrar considers there are special reasons to do that.

 

ITEM 2 & 3. The grounds for refusing the CCPAs appears based specifically on my successful complaint to my credit card provider (CBA) who found that GSE Act employed Bechini used my credit card details WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION.

(copy of CBA letter)

a. In her Aug.22,2022 email GSE Act employed Clegg stated:

Method of payment of fees
I note you attach a fee waiver request and a credit card authority form with your applications for service (sound recording) and your applications to initiate proceedings. In the event the fee waiver is refused you do not give clear instructions that registry is authorised to process the fee using the credit card authority.

i. the registry previously received my instructions concerning the CCPA where the fee waiver application was refused

ii. In SUBSTANTIALLY EVERY REFUSAL of my LEGITIMATE CCPAs,the GSE Act employed registry officer DID NOT REQUEST ANY FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS concerning the CCPA.

iii. In MULTIPLE INSTANCES the GSE Act employed registry officer SHREDDED MY LEGITIMATE CCPA rather than seek further instructions

iv. there is NO PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENT to provide “further instructions” when an application form is submitted with a LEGITIMATE & VALID CCPA

v. The NCAT fee waiver application form specifically states:

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT FEE WAIVERS
3.The fee waiver request form should be given to the Tribunal at the same time as your application.

4.If your request for fee waiver is not approved, you will need to pay the fee.

—————————————————————————————————

b. In her Aug.22,2022 email GSE Act employed Clegg stated:

On two occasions after registry processed the fee and provided you sound recording by express post you contacted your bank and advised that the transactions were unauthorised because “Documentation not supplied in timeframe”.

i.This is alleged to be a BLATANT LIE!

• My complaint to CBA was specifically about 2 UNAUTHORIZED TRANSACTIONS on my credit card
• The CBA letter makes NO SUCH STATEMENT
• The tribunal was & is well aware that my complaints concerned UNAUTHORIZED TRANSACTIONS made by the alleged CORRUPT GSE Act employed Michell Bechini

(Refer to MISCONDUCT – MICHELE BECHINI,REG STAFF Documentation will be uploaded soon)

ii. The 2 credit card transaction were UNAUTHORIZED as

• I DID NOT provide any permission to use my credit card details
• I DID NOT provide those credit card details for these applications
• I DID NOT specify payment for those transaction using my credit card details

GSE Act employed Michele Bechini & GSE Act employed Cathy Szczygielski were informed of my specific instructions to use a CREDIT I had with NCAT as a result of THEIR MISTAKE

This sort of conduct appears to indicate that SELF REGULATED registry staff believe themselves to be ABOVE THE LAW and can perpetrate ALLEGED UNLAWFUL / ALLEGED CORRUPT CONDUCT without fear of prejudice or prosecution.

——————————————————————————————————

c. Act employed Clegg further stated:

As a result, NCAT will only accept payment from you by cheque/money order, use of the Secure payment portal or you may pay at an NCAT registry or ServiceNSW.

NCAT will not accept or process payment using the credit card authority form.

I acknowledge the information provided to you on 10 August 2022 regarding the credit card payment form was not explained fully.

i. The above restriction is based on a DELIBERATE & MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

ii. The above restriction are BLATANTLY PETTY,VINDICTIVE & MALICIOUS.

I have exercised my LEGITIMATE AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER RIGHTS as a result of alleged DELIBERATE & MALICIOUS breaches of LEGISLATED MANDATORY CONDUCT OBLIGATIONS pursuant to GSE Act Sect.7 Government Sector Core Values & clearly UNLAWFUL CONDUCT by the alleged corrupt GSE Act employed Michele Bechini.

iii. I have sent MULTIPLE EMAILS & COMPLAINTS seeking REASONS FOR THIS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT.

2. There are no grounds provided by GSE Act employed Clegg for refusing any correspondence or documents related to the GRIFFIN@PZGIPA.COM email address. The GRIFIN@PZGIPA.COM address

• was accepted by NCAT when the 2022/000196935 appeal application was submitted (Jul.7,2022)
• has been used by NCAT to email numerous NCAT notices,NCAT correspondence & NCAT orders since Jul.8,2022
• has been used by the Crown Solicitors Office for sending / receiving correspondence

PRIOR to Aug 23,2023 = 7 times POST Aug.23,2023 = 44 times 3. On Aug.27,2022 GSE Act employed Clegg was sent my email response. This email included documents challenging her restrictions which are based on FALSEHOODS. My Aug.27,2022 response also raises other issues of GSE Act employed Cleggs UNLAWFUL conduct   To date GSE Act employed Clegg has refused to respond. A formal complaint has been made to the NSW Ombudsman A formal complaint is being made to ICAC as GSE Act employed Cleggs UNLAWFUL conduct has prejudiced my legal & procedural rights (there are distinct elements of corrupt conduct)   Documents substantiating the above can be downloaded (including the formal Ombudsman complaint) REFER TO OUR DISCLAIMER

* Corruption as defined by ICAC Act Sect.7,8 & 9

NOTE: BGSE Act employed Louise Clegg has been requested a right of reply concerning the authors complaints but to date GSE Act employed Louise Clegg has refused to respond

* SRNLPA = Self Represented,Non-Legal Professional (time poor,resource poor) Applicants